Introduction
The world of firearms is constantly evolving, with innovations catering to various needs and preferences. Among these, Pistol Caliber Carbines (PCCs) have gained significant traction in recent years. These firearms offer a unique blend of advantages: the familiarity of pistol ammunition, combined with the increased accuracy and range potential of a carbine platform. They’re often favored for home defense, recreational shooting, and even competitive scenarios. But with so many options available, which PCC truly stands out? Today, we’re diving into a head-to-head comparison, analyzing two popular contenders: the Kel-Tec Sub 2000 and the Smith & Wesson FPC. Both of these guns offer a compact design, making them popular choices for people looking for something they can take to the range or have available for home defense. Let’s see which one takes the crown.
Design and Features
The initial impression of any firearm often comes down to its design and the features it offers. These two PCCs showcase distinct approaches to the same goal: a compact, effective firearm.
The Kel-Tec Sub 2000
The Sub 2000 immediately grabs attention with its folding design. This characteristic is its defining trait, allowing it to fold in half, significantly reducing its overall length for storage and transport. This compactness is a major selling point, making it easy to stow in a backpack, car, or other confined spaces.
The Sub 2000 is chambered in either 9mm or .40 S&W, providing flexibility for ammunition choice. A noteworthy feature of the Sub 2000 is its magazine compatibility. Depending on the model, the Sub 2000 can be compatible with Glock magazines or other popular pistol magazines, a huge advantage for those who already own Glock pistols or are looking to standardize their magazines. This compatibility streamlines the ammunition and magazine procurement process.
The Sub 2000 typically comes with iron sights, which are sufficient for many users. However, the receiver also accepts aftermarket upgrades, opening the door for customized optics, such as red dot sights or scopes. This offers flexibility to enhance accuracy and target acquisition.
The Sub 2000 is a relatively lightweight firearm, especially when folded. Its compact dimensions contribute to its ease of handling and maneuverability.
The Smith & Wesson FPC
The Smith & Wesson FPC, or Folding Pistol Carbine, takes a different approach to the folding concept. The FPC’s design incorporates a folding mechanism as well, but the fold is done from the side of the receiver. This allows for a more streamlined design.
The FPC is chambered exclusively in 9mm. The choice to focus on 9mm simplifies the manufacturing process.
The FPC distinguishes itself with its magazine compatibility with Smith & Wesson’s M&P series of pistols. This consistency is a significant advantage for those who already own M&P firearms, as it allows them to share magazines, reducing the need to purchase and manage multiple magazine types.
The FPC offers a built-in Picatinny rail section for mounting optics, lights, or other accessories. This allows for a highly customizable setup, tailoring the firearm to individual shooting preferences.
The FPC is similarly designed to be light and easily carried, but the exact dimensions and weight may vary slightly depending on the configuration.
Comparing Design and Features
Comparing the Kel-Tec Sub 2000 and the Smith & Wesson FPC, there are clear distinctions. Both firearms incorporate a folding mechanism for enhanced portability, however, their individual characteristics differ. The Sub 2000’s folding design is very efficient in terms of packed space, but the FPC’s side-folding design has its benefits as well. The Sub 2000’s magazine compatibility provides a wider range of options, while the FPC’s focus on M&P magazines is an advantage for those already invested in the Smith & Wesson ecosystem. Finally, the built-in rail on the FPC can provide better adaptability in terms of customization.
Ergonomics and Handling
Beyond the technical specifications, the feel of a firearm in hand is crucial. This section focuses on the ergonomics and handling characteristics of the two PCCs.
The Kel-Tec Sub 2000
The Sub 2000 often has a unique grip feel. Depending on the individual user, the grip may feel slightly less comfortable than some other carbines. The controls, like the safety and magazine release, are generally well-placed and within easy reach, but the manual of arms requires getting used to. Handling is generally easy, due to the gun’s weight and compact design. The folding mechanism can be operated quickly, making it easy to deploy or stow the firearm.
The Smith & Wesson FPC
The Smith & Wesson FPC often incorporates design elements that promote comfort, and has a grip that feels more familiar to those who use S&W handguns. The controls are well-placed and designed for ease of use. The manual of arms of the FPC is very easy, and familiar to many shooters. The FPC’s balance often leads to a more comfortable shooting experience.
Comparing Ergonomics and Handling
In terms of ergonomics, the FPC and the Sub 2000 offer different experiences. The FPC leans towards a more traditionally comfortable feel, while the Sub 2000’s ergonomics, while not bad, may take some getting used to. Overall, the FPC might offer a more comfortable and instinctive handling experience for a wider range of shooters, however, the Sub 2000’s compactness is a major plus.
Performance
Ultimately, the true test of any firearm lies in its performance. How do these PCCs perform on the range?
The Kel-Tec Sub 2000
The Sub 2000 provides decent accuracy at reasonable ranges. The iron sights are adequate for the intended use, but upgrading to an optic can significantly enhance accuracy. Recoil is minimal due to the 9mm or .40 S&W rounds. Reliability can be good, but it depends on the model. Barrel length is relatively short in both chamberings, however, barrel length can impact bullet velocity, which can lead to reduced energy at longer distances.
The Smith & Wesson FPC
The Smith & Wesson FPC offers good accuracy. The built-in Picatinny rail provides an easy platform for mounting optics, which can improve accuracy and target acquisition. The felt recoil is also low, which allows for easier follow-up shots. Reliability is generally excellent, and the FPC is built to last. Barrel length is typical of the class, and barrel length can impact bullet velocity, which can lead to increased energy at longer distances.
Comparing Performance
Both firearms exhibit comparable shooting performance. The FPC often gains the edge due to its optic readiness, which may be important for shooters. The Sub 2000 delivers decent accuracy, and its portability and magazine compatibility give it a unique appeal. Both firearms offer a reliable shooting experience.
Price and Value
Cost is a significant factor for many buyers. How do the Kel-Tec Sub 2000 and Smith & Wesson FPC stack up in terms of price and value?
The Kel-Tec Sub 2000
The Sub 2000 has a reputation for being a budget-friendly option. Its price point often makes it an attractive entry point for those looking to get into the PCC world. This affordability enhances its value proposition.
The Smith & Wesson FPC
The Smith & Wesson FPC typically carries a slightly higher price tag compared to the Sub 2000. This higher cost is justified by the inclusion of more features and the brand name. The value comes down to whether the added features and perceived quality justify the higher price.
Comparing Price and Value
The Sub 2000 generally offers better value to a wider audience, due to its lower cost. The FPC’s higher price tag reflects its additional features and brand prestige. Deciding which one offers the best value depends heavily on individual needs and budgets.
Pros and Cons
Here’s a quick rundown of the advantages and disadvantages of each firearm.
The Kel-Tec Sub 2000
- Pros: Extremely compact when folded, magazine compatibility with Glock magazines, lightweight, affordable.
- Cons: Ergonomics can be polarizing, potentially less refined build quality, iron sights only.
The Smith & Wesson FPC
- Pros: Comfortable ergonomics, magazine compatibility with M&P pistols, reliable operation, optic-ready platform.
- Cons: Slightly more expensive, folding mechanism less compact than the Sub 2000.
The Kel-Tec Sub 2000 and the Smith & Wesson FPC are two different, unique firearms, with different strengths and weaknesses.
Conclusion
In the competitive landscape of Pistol Caliber Carbines, both the Kel-Tec Sub 2000 and the Smith & Wesson FPC bring something unique to the table. The Sub 2000’s defining characteristic is its folding design, allowing for unparalleled portability. This is its primary strength and a significant advantage for those seeking a compact, easily stored firearm. Additionally, its magazine compatibility, particularly with Glock magazines, is a major draw for many. The FPC, on the other hand, is built to be a higher-end firearm. It’s more comfortable, and often has better features.
Which PCC reigns supreme? The answer depends entirely on the individual. If portability and cost-effectiveness are paramount, the Kel-Tec Sub 2000 is a strong contender. Its compact form factor and budget-friendly price make it appealing.
For individuals who value ergonomics, optic readiness, and compatibility with M&P pistols, the Smith & Wesson FPC is likely the better choice. The FPC provides a more refined shooting experience.
Ultimately, the best choice is the one that best suits the user’s needs, preferences, and budget. Considering the factors discussed, and weighing the pros and cons, should assist in making an informed decision. It is best to try both firearms to see which one feels better in your hands. Consider range time with both firearms before making a final decision.
The Kel-Tec Sub 2000 vs. Smith & Wesson FPC debate highlights the diversity within the PCC market, where individual priorities ultimately dictate the “superior” firearm. Remember to always prioritize safe gun handling.
