close

Decoding the Mystery: Is the Springfield Model 87a Full Auto?

A Look Back: The Springfield Model 87a and Its Origins

The world of firearms is rife with speculation, whispered stories, and persistent myths. One such legend surrounds the Springfield Model 87a, a humble .22 caliber rifle that has enjoyed widespread popularity over the decades. Affectionately remembered by many as a reliable plinker and a gateway to the world of shooting, the Model 87a has also been the subject of a tantalizing question: could this seemingly innocuous rifle be secretly capable of full-auto fire? This article delves into the heart of this mystery, exploring the history, design, and legal ramifications surrounding the potential for such a conversion, ultimately aiming to separate fact from fiction.

The Springfield Model 87a wasn’t born in a vacuum; its lineage traces back to a long and storied history of arms manufacturing. The company name, Springfield, itself can be slightly misleading as it primarily represents the brand name used by Savage Arms. The rifles were often marked Springfield but produced by the Savage Arms Company. Savage Arms, in turn, acquired the Stevens Arms Company. This blending of entities led to the creation of a myriad of firearms, particularly .22 caliber rifles, including the 87a.

The Springfield Model 87a itself emerged during a period when .22 rifles were gaining substantial popularity. They represented an accessible and relatively inexpensive way to participate in the shooting sports or to learn the fundamentals of marksmanship. The 87a, in its various iterations, was a direct response to this growing demand. The rifle was designed to be a simple, reliable, and affordable firearm, targeting the recreational shooter and the novice alike. The basic design of the 87a was centered around a semi-automatic action, a common feature in .22 rifles of its era. This meant that each time the rifle was fired, the spent cartridge would be ejected, and a new round would be chambered, all courtesy of the energy generated by the initial firing. This simplified operation was a key selling point, allowing for rapid follow-up shots compared to manual action rifles. Its appeal was broad, finding favor with both younger shooters and seasoned enthusiasts. The rifle, and its predecessors, quickly became a familiar sight in rural communities, serving purposes ranging from pest control to informal target practice.

Dissecting the Design: Unveiling the Inner Workings

To address the question of full-auto capability, we need to delve into the technical design of the Springfield Model 87a. A thorough examination of the internal components is crucial to assess whether the rifle inherently supports full-auto firing or whether significant modifications would be required.

The 87a operates on a blowback action, a design that is common in .22 caliber firearms. In blowback actions, the bolt is held closed by the weight and inertia of the bolt itself and the force of the recoil spring. When the cartridge is fired, the expanding gases push the bullet down the barrel and simultaneously push the cartridge case back against the bolt face. The inertia of the bolt and the spring resistance delay the movement of the bolt long enough for the bullet to exit the barrel and for the pressure inside the barrel to drop to a safe level. Then, the bolt begins to move rearward, extracting and ejecting the spent cartridge.

The key to semi-automatic operation lies in the interaction between the bolt, the sear, the trigger, and the hammer (or firing pin). In a typical semi-automatic design like the 87a, when the trigger is pulled, the sear releases the hammer. The hammer strikes the firing pin (or, in some designs, directly strikes the rim of the cartridge), which in turn ignites the primer, igniting the propellant. The bolt then cycles backward and forward. The trigger mechanism is designed in such a way that it prevents the hammer from immediately being released again. The trigger must be released and pulled again for the sear to engage the hammer.

The primary difference between a semi-automatic and a full-auto firearm lies in the trigger and sear mechanism. A full-auto design allows the hammer to continue cycling and firing rounds for as long as the trigger is held down. This requires a mechanism that keeps the hammer engaged after firing and then releases it again to strike the next cartridge. The 87a, in its original design, lacks this crucial mechanism. It doesn’t have the necessary components to continuously cycle and fire ammunition without individual trigger pulls.

Attempting to convert the 87a to full-auto would therefore require major alterations to the trigger mechanism, sear engagement, and possibly the bolt design itself. These alterations would be very complex. Such modifications would also likely place considerable stress on the rifle’s components, potentially leading to malfunctions or even dangerous failures. Furthermore, the .22 cartridge, despite its low power, could be problematic in a full-auto setup due to the inherent stresses on the firing pin and other components. A full-auto .22 could quickly become a jam-o-matic.

The Legal Ramifications: Navigating the Maze

Any discussion about full-auto firearms inevitably involves the legal landscape. In the United States, the acquisition and possession of full-auto weapons are heavily regulated under the National Firearms Act (NFA). This act mandates that all full-auto firearms must be registered with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), and they are subject to rigorous background checks and significant taxation.

Furthermore, the manufacture or conversion of a firearm into a full-auto configuration is heavily restricted. Unauthorized conversion of a semi-automatic firearm, such as the Springfield Model 87a, into a full-auto weapon is a federal offense. This carries severe penalties, including substantial fines and lengthy prison sentences.

The legal implications are not just theoretical; they have real-world consequences. Individuals caught in possession of an unregistered or illegally converted firearm can face life-altering consequences. The legal framework is designed to protect public safety and to prevent the proliferation of potentially dangerous weapons. Attempting to circumvent these regulations is not only illegal but also irresponsible.

Putting Rumors to Rest: Clearing Up Misconceptions

The internet, in particular, is a breeding ground for misinformation and speculation. Regarding the Springfield Model 87a, there are often persistent rumors that circulate concerning its potential for full-auto conversion. These stories sometimes involve alleged “proof” or anecdotal evidence.

These rumors often stem from a misunderstanding of the firearm’s design. Sometimes, there may be a misinterpretation of modification, or what someone thought they saw. There is often little truth to such claims. The fact remains that the 87a, in its original design, was never intended for full-auto operation, and there is little to no evidence that any factory model has ever been converted, or even tested, for that capability.

Any claims of full-auto functionality with the 87a are, at best, dubious, and at worst, deliberately misleading.

Alternatives and Options: Exploring Different Avenues

While the Springfield Model 87a is not designed for full-auto, other firearms do indeed possess this capability. If you are interested in full-auto, you’ll want to research weapons designed for that purpose, and also to acquire those weapons legally. This is crucial to preventing legal troubles, and also to ensure your own safety.

If you are simply interested in semi-automatic .22 rifles, then the world is your oyster. The .22 semi-automatic is a ubiquitous type of firearm, used for everything from casual target shooting to hunting small game.

Conclusion: Unmasking the Truth

So, can the Springfield Model 87a be a full-auto rifle? The answer is a resounding, and legally sound, “no.” While any firearm can theoretically be altered, the design limitations of the 87a, combined with the legal and safety concerns, make such a conversion highly improbable. The rifle, in its original form, was simply not designed for full-auto operation. Rumors and misconceptions, unfortunately, often cloud the truth.

The Springfield Model 87a remains a classic example of a reliable and affordable semi-automatic .22 rifle. As such, its legacy is not about any full-auto aspirations, but its role as a well-loved and reliable firearm.

Leave a Comment

close